Tuesday, 10 November 2009

Meet the CFDA Finalists

 The CFDA/ Vogue Fashion Fund Award is one of the industry's most important award for emerging designers: the grand prize includes a grant of $200,000 and mentoring by established industry professionals. Vogue published a short profile of each nominee in its November issue.There was a mix of women's apparel designers, men's apparel designers, and accessories designers. Despite the different categories, all the designers were similar in a sense: each designer either preserves traditional craft methods in their work or utilizes sustainable practices. I picked my favorites below--feel free to post yours in the comments! Who do you think should win and why? (All images Norman Jean Roy/Vogue. Click to enlarge.)

Women's Apparel: Gary Graham 

 Graham attended the Art Institute of Chicago and worked with Broadway costume designers before entering the world of fashion design. He now has a store in Tribeca that, according to him, is meant to evoke the backstage area of the Brooklyn Academy of Music. All the world's a stage for the woman who wears Gary Graham: his collections clearly evoke certain eras of costume history while taying completely on trend. It's no small feat to balance costume and fashion, and I think Graham has succeeded. His use of darks and lights, as well as his innovative finishing processes, make his clothes look used and new at the same time. His work creates a haunting bridge between the past and present while questioning the nature of fashion in the process. 

Men's Design: Patrik Ervell


 Patrik Ervell never planned on becoming a fashion designer:  he studied the economy of industrialized societies at UC Berkeley. He moved to New York and made some T-shirts for Opening Ceremony--the rest is history. Ervell is known for designing beautifully fitting suits and utilizing fabric in strange new ways. For his Spring 2010 show, he explored the theme of Americana: he took that most American fabric cotton and invented a way to get metal to rust on fabric.

Accessories Design: House of Waris 

 
You may have seen Waris Ahluwalia in some Wes Anderson films, but he's really a jewelry designer. Ahluwalia is known for his unique designs: beautiful, handcrafted, one-of-a-kind. Ahluwalia used to have his jewelry made in New York but now produces all of his jewelry in Jaipur, India, to protect and encourage Old World craft techniques. Unfortunately, his website doesn't have any images of his jewelry, but here's a close-up of one of his famous bird pendants:

 
House of Waris/WWD.com

As for the winner, I think it will be Sophie Theallet. Her work is more traditional than the other nominees', but, like them, her focus is on preserving and adapting traditional crafts for a new era. Her designs are beautiful, her color sense spot-on, her construction impeccable. If she wins this award, it will be well-deserved.



Wednesday, 4 November 2009

My Boyfriend Is the President.

File this under internet obsessions: I'm pretty sure this is the best video of all time. If your brain hasn't been blown to smithereens afterwards, Gizmodo has context. (Related: Someone make me a My Boyfriend Is the White House Chief of Staff video.)

Monday, 2 November 2009

Whose Fault Is This?

 Last week, while discussing Susan Bordo's essay "Whose Body Is This? Feminism, Medicine, and the Conceptualization of Eating Disorders" in Intro to Women's Studies, we started with a now familiar exercise: looking at images from fashion editorials and magazines and criticizing them for false representations of the female body, promotion of unhealthy lifestyles, etc., etc. The exercise always annoyed me a little bit on some level, but I could never quite put my finger on it Until now. I came across this quotation from comedian Russel Brand:

The fashion industry makes an elite few feel better about themselves and most people feel worse about themselves. It makes them bulimic and anorexic. It’s stimulating a desire that could never be fulfilled. It’s decoration on a dreadful wedding cake at a marriage between us and the demise of the planet.

I disagree. In high school, I really hated all of the fashionable girls. They were short and skinny--no curves whatsoever. They happened to be very neurotic about their eating habits, and I wouldn't be surprised if some of them had developed eating disorders. I made the mistake of linking their neuroses with their interest in fashion, and also made the mistake of linking the industry as a whole with eating disorders. In fact, in high school, even though I told everyone I wanted to work in comic books, I secretly wanted to go into fashion to make clothes that could flatter everyone and wouldn't promote a negative body image. I wanted to be a revolutionary: if the fashion industry didn't want my curves, if it didn't value my body, then I would just have to make it do just that.

There is no doubt that the fashion industry is a very sick industry. For example, at a 92nd Street Y event about the future of the fashion industry, Issey Miyake said, "Honestly, I've actually booked girls [for a fashion show] that weren't obese, they were real girls. Like gorgeous anatomy. And one was a stripper. And you could feel the energy in the room just go down. Closed the books. Pens went down. They were angry. I could feel the anger. And I never did it again, because I thought Why bother? It takes a lot to rile women. It takes like actual breasts....Fashion advertisements are hateful. Hateful. Yeah, but they wouldn't do it unless it worked, right? It works." Even when fashion insiders try to champion different body types, the lookism and misogyny pours out. There is still an ingrained idea that there are normal-sized women, and that women just naturally hate each other.

When we blame the fashion industry for producing unattainable cultural norms, I think we really miss the mark. There's the old chicken-and-the-egg conundrum of fashion theory: does fashion produce culture or does culture produce fashion? I firmly believe that fashion is a response to the culture that surrounds it. For example, the 15th century in Europe--the height of the Gothic period--gave birth to an extreme vertical silhouette, a silhouette that echoed Gothic cathedrals. The 16th century, on the other hand, saw an effort to constrain the body in tight doublets and farthingales (early hoop skirts)--the body became horizontal, rounded, rational, an echo of humanist teaching. So to say that the fashion industry forces people to hate their bodies is to make the industry into a scapegoat. According to Bordo's essay, our culture traps us in a continuum of self-hatred--whether we exercise vigorously or suffer from an eating disorder, there is the underlying idea that the body is an unruly beast that refuses to adapt to cultural norms, and that is somehow a bad thing.

The exercise in the Women's Studies class could have been done with any advertisement, really. Yet fashion, by its very nature, amplifies our cultural norms to an extreme, and that is why we see so many skinny or even unhealthy bodies in editorials and advertisements. Perhaps this is the reason people fear fashion, because it is pure, unadulterated culture: we look at our assumptions and anxieties squarely in the face--we can choose to ignore them, mock them, or glorify them through our clothes. But the fashion industry is hardly the only industry at fault. As Bordo's argument implies, we need to tell all cultural producers--music, publishing, advertising, film, TV, entertainment, sports, etc.--is that we are sick and tired of being told that there is only one "right" way to behave or look. If we only point our fingers at the fashion industry, we just ignore the larger problem.

PS: Don't forget to vote in our poll! It's fun!!!

Friday, 23 October 2009

Reel To Real #4: Brigitte Bardot in "Contempt (Le Mepris)"



So I was requested to feature Brigitte Bardot in "Contempt", and coincidentally, this was one of the examples I had in mind when I thought of this column. Jean-Luc Godard's 1963 film may actually be the most visually stunning movie i've ever seen. I mean, it takes place (partially) in Capri! So as to not blend in with the unforgettable settings, Bardot's wardrobe had to be very memorable. 

As the commenter wrote, "solid colors, thin silhouettes, oh my!". The entire film (as in much of Godard's work from this era) is characterized by a use of bold primary colors, which extends to Bardot's look. She looks very put-together but not in a dull or dowdy way. Her look is great and easy to copy because it can be worn in either a professional or casual setting (think high-waisted pencil skirts, cardigans, ballet flats, and stripes). "Contempt" takes place in a sunny, paradise-like setting, so your look shouldn't be heavy.


(Bardot with Godard on set)
Her look is more playful when it comes to makeup; it is Brigitte Bardot after all, so she sports her famous cat eyes, which you can copy by liberally applying liquid eyeliner. And you too can rock that giant headband- just make sure it isn't white (when I tried that my sister said I looked like I had a head injury)
Proof that the "Contempt" look is easy to replicate? I've done it myself plenty of times:

Wednesday, 21 October 2009

New York Gets Fashion Incubator

According to an article by Jennifer 8. Lee of the New York Times, New York City is getting a fashion incubator for up-and-coming designers. The Bloomberg administration proposed the plan as a way to not only occupy otherwise empty space but to shore up some of the city's industries (the administration has set up similar incubators for freelance finance workers, restaurant workers, and media workers).

The idea behind the space is this: designers who have been working for a year and a half and employ a staff (paid or volunteer) can apply for a showroom. The rent would be extremely cheap, subsidized in part by a grant from the city. The CFDA would offer educational seminars on industry issues. There would be twelve showrooms in all.

The building is located on W 38th Street--the heart of the Garment District. With this incubator, the city can try to preserve the Garment District; the CFDA can help young talent enter Manhattan; the owner of the building can attract young, interesting tenants; and the emerging designers can have a dream showroom in Manhattan. Let's hope this works.

Tuesday, 20 October 2009

Poll!

Contrast needs your help. We want to find out what your favorite fashion blog is. (Obviously Contrast, but we mean your favorite non-Vassar fashion blog. ;-P) Vote for your favorite in the poll, or, if you don't see it, write it in the comments.

Saturday, 17 October 2009

Happy October Break!



Rahm, you didn't show the pretty pictures to the kids! Oh well. Enjoy the adorableness.

From new Internet obsession rahmblr.

Friday, 16 October 2009

Reel to Real #3: Janeane Garofolo in "Reality Bites"

So at the latest "Potpourri" in the college center I found this dress (for only ten dollars!):

After buying it I realized that part of why I liked it so much is that its baby-doll style and pattern reminds me of Janeane Garofolo in  the 90s time capsule "Reality Bites." Winona Ryder may be the movie's star (and she's wonderful), but Garofolo steals the show with her sardonic wit, not to mention her Bettie Page bangs and eclectic, fun style:



Her look in the movie is playful. Think baby-doll dresses and colored tights (which may subconsciously be why these two things are a staple of my wardrobe). Wearing patterns will also help you get her look. In the movie her bedroom walls are covered in kitschy posters, so don't be afraid to have fun and to have a sense of humor while dressing